White v. Ezekwe
- Philip Halpern
- 7:22-cv-04451
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In White v. Ezekwe, Judge Halpern ordered service on Ezekwe but dismissed White’s claims against Ferdous for failure to state a claim.
Frank W. White, Jr.’s claims against Razia Ferdous were dismissed, while the court directed service of the claims against Felix Ikeshukwu Ezekwe. The Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to complete the service process.
What happened
White v. Ezekwe concerns Frank W. White, Jr.’s pro se civil-rights lawsuit under federal law based on alleged constitutional violations while he was incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility. The court had allowed White to proceed without prepaying filing fees.
The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and prepare service documents for Felix Ikeshukwu Ezekwe, with service to be carried out by the U.S. Marshals Service. The court dismissed all claims against Razia Ferdous because White did not allege facts showing that she was personally involved in the events underlying his claims.
Judge Philip M. Halpern ordered the service steps for Ezekwe and dismissed White’s claims against Ferdous. The court also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.
The detailed version
- White v. Ezekwe · No. 7:22-cv-04451
- Philip Halpern
- Sept. 13, 2022
Background
Frank W. White, Jr., who was incarcerated at Upstate Correctional Facility, filed this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims against state actors for constitutional violations. He alleged that his constitutional rights were violated while he was incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility. The court had previously granted him permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.
Screening and service
Because White was proceeding without prepaying filing fees, the court reviewed the complaint under the prisoner-screening statutes. The court explained that a § 1983 claim requires facts showing each defendant’s direct and personal involvement in the alleged constitutional violation. A person cannot be held liable merely because that person employs or supervises someone who allegedly violated the plaintiff’s rights.
The court found that White did not allege facts showing how Defendant Razia Ferdous was personally involved in the events underlying his claims. It therefore dismissed all claims against Ferdous for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
The court did not dismiss the claims against Defendant Felix Ikeshukwu Ezekwe at this stage. It directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, complete the required service forms with Ezekwe’s address, and deliver the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. If service was not completed within 90 days after the summons was issued, the court stated that White should request an extension of time.
Disposition
Judge Philip M. Halpern ordered service on Ezekwe and dismissed White’s claims against Ferdous for failure to state a claim. The court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.