Fredrick v. Doe
- Analisa Torres
- 1:20-cv-05738
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Nigel Fredricks v. Alexis Parrilla, Judge Torres adopted the report, granted defendants’ summary-judgment motion, denied Fredricks’s cross-motion, and closed the case.
Nigel Fredricks, who represented himself, and defendants Alexis Parrilla, Duayne John, John Shaheen, Travis Richards, Andrew Henry, and Omar Smith. The case was closed after the defendants won summary judgment and Fredricks’s cross-motion was denied.
What happened
In Nigel Fredricks v. Alexis Parrilla, the court considered a report and recommendation from Magistrate Judge James L. Cott. No party objected to that report.
Judge Analisa Torres reviewed the report for clear error and found none. She adopted it in full.
Judge Torres granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denied Nigel Fredricks’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The court directed the Clerk to close the case and mail the order to Fredricks, who was representing himself.
The detailed version
- Fredrick v. Doe · No. 1:20-cv-05738
- Analisa Torres
- Sept. 13, 2022
Background
The opinion states that Magistrate Judge James L. Cott issued a report and recommendation. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the report’s reasoning. No party filed objections.
Court’s analysis
Judge Analisa Torres reviewed the report for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found none. The court therefore adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety.
Ruling
The court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denied Nigel Fredricks’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the two motions, mail a copy of the order to Fredricks, who was proceeding without a lawyer, and close the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.