Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 14, 2022

Muminovic v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-07856
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Muminovic v. Blizzard, Chief Judge Swain transferred the action to California because venue was improper in New York.

Who this affects

Muminovic’s action was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Central District of California; Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. is the defendant, and the transferee court will address whether Muminovic may proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Muminovic v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc., Ing. Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Elhar Muminovic, who resides in Linz, Austria, sued Blizzard Entertainment, Inc., seeking what appeared to be money damages and a court declaration. He represented himself.

The court found that Muminovic did not allege that Blizzard resided in the Southern District of New York or that substantial events connected to his claims occurred there. The opinion states that Blizzard is located in Irvine, California, which is in the Central District of California.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain transferred the action to the Central District of California in the interest of justice. The order closed the action in the Southern District of New York, left any decision about proceeding without paying fees to the transferee court, and denied fee-free status for an appeal after certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Muminovic v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-07856
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 14, 2022

Background

Ing. Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Elhar Muminovic, who resides in Linz, Austria, filed this action without a lawyer against Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. The opinion says that he appeared to seek monetary damages and declaratory relief. Muminovic alleged that Blizzard resides in Irvine, Orange County, California.

Venue analysis

Federal venue rules generally allow a civil case to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the relevant events occurred, or, when no other district qualifies, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. The court concluded that Muminovic did not allege that Blizzard resides in the Southern District of New York or that substantial events giving rise to his claims occurred there. Venue was therefore not proper in that district.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406, when a case is filed in the wrong venue, the court may dismiss it or, in the interest of justice, transfer it to a district where it could have been filed. Because Irvine is within the Central District of California, the court concluded that venue was proper there under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1).

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The order closed the action in the Southern District of New York; it did not decide the underlying claims. The transferee court will decide whether Muminovic may proceed without prepaying filing fees. The court also ordered that a summons would not issue from the Southern District of New York and denied fee-free status for an appeal after certifying that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.