Edris v. City of New York
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:22-cv-07095
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Edris v. City of New York, Judge Schofield denied injunctive relief because it targeted nonparties and claims outside the lawsuit.
Ahmed Samiraly Edris’s request for emergency injunctive relief was denied; the order addressed requests involving the New York City Police Department, unnamed storage-facility owners, and unnamed federal law enforcement officials.
What happened
Edris v. City of New York concerns Ahmed Samiraly Edris’s request for emergency court orders about alleged thefts from storage units he rents.
Edris asked the New York City Police Department to investigate, storage-facility owners to monitor his units, and federal law enforcement officials to protect the proceedings and case documents. The complaint itself alleged that defendants allowed third parties to assault him and steal his belongings at the homeless shelter where he resides.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield denied the request against the unnamed storage-facility owners and federal law enforcement officials because they were not defendants. She also denied the request against the New York City Police Department because it concerned different thefts and claims not presented in the complaint.
The detailed version
- Edris v. City of New York · No. 1:22-cv-07095
- Lorna Schofield
- Sept. 15, 2022
Background
Ahmed Samiraly Edris filed this case seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief, meaning a court order requiring or prohibiting particular conduct. The complaint alleged that defendants permitted third parties to assault Edris and steal his belongings at the homeless shelter where he resides.
On September 9, 2022, Edris submitted a letter seeking emergency help concerning alleged thefts from storage units that he rents. The letter asked the New York City Police Department to investigate, the owners of the storage facilities to monitor his units to prevent further theft, and federal law enforcement officials to provide additional protection for the proceedings and documents filed in the case. The court construed the letter as an application for injunctive relief.
Rulings
The court denied the application for injunctive relief against the unnamed storage-facility owners and unnamed federal law enforcement officials. It explained that the requested relief was not directed at defendants in this case and that an injunction generally binds only the parties and certain persons acting with them.
The court also denied the application for injunctive relief against the New York City Police Department. The court held that the request was not based on the claims at issue in the lawsuit. The complaint concerned alleged assaults and thefts at the homeless shelter, while the application concerned different thefts from storage units. The court therefore concluded that the application was outside its authority in this case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.