Johnson v. Body & Pole, Inc.
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-00857
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Johnson v. Body & Pole, Judge Broderick ordered the parties to submit their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement for review.
The plaintiffs—Meghan Piper Johnson, Rebecca Pardue, and Rodenellie Pluviose—and the defendants—Body & Pole, Inc. and Kyra Johannesen—were required to submit the settlement materials to the court.
What happened
In Johnson v. Body & Pole, Inc., the court was told that the parties had reached a settlement of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law.
The court explained that the parties could not privately settle those claims without approval from the court or the Department of Labor. The court must decide whether the settlement is fair and reasonable, including by considering the possible recovery, litigation burdens and risks, negotiation process, and potential fraud or collusion.
Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the parties to provide the settlement terms within 30 days, along with a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the agreement is fair and reasonable. If the agreement includes attorney’s fees, they must also provide supporting evidence, including billing records.
The detailed version
- Johnson v. Body & Pole, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-00857
- Laura Swain
- Sept. 19, 2022
Background
The plaintiffs are Meghan Piper Johnson, Rebecca Pardue, and Rodenellie Pluviose, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated people. The defendants are Body & Pole, Inc. and Kyra Johannesen. The opinion states that the parties reached a settlement in a case brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Settlement-review standard
The court explained that FLSA claims cannot be privately settled without approval from the district court or the Department of Labor. The court must determine whether the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable by considering the totality of the circumstances, including:
- the plaintiffs’ possible recovery; - the extent to which settlement would avoid the burdens and costs of proving the claims and defenses; - the seriousness of the litigation risks; - whether experienced counsel negotiated the agreement at arm’s length; and - the possibility of fraud or collusion.
The court also stated that any attorney’s-fee provision must be assessed separately. Counsel must provide a factual basis for a fee award, including contemporaneous billing records showing, for each attorney, the date, hours worked, and nature of the work.
Order
The court did not approve the settlement in this order. It ordered the parties, within 30 days, to submit the settlement terms so the court could determine whether they comply with the FLSA and reflect a reasonable compromise of disputed issues. The parties must also submit a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why they believe the settlement is fair and reasonable, including information about the listed factors. If the agreement includes attorney’s fees, the parties must submit evidence supporting the award.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.