Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 22, 2022

Johnson v. Tennyson

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:22-cv-05683
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Johnson v. Tennyson, Judge Furman set procedures for counsel’s withdrawal motion and adjourned the initial pretrial conference.

Who this affects

Defense counsel Evan W. Talley; defendants Ray Tennyson, Ray Tennyson LLC, and Amazing Paint Party LLC; plaintiff Eric Johnson.

What happened

In Johnson v. Tennyson, defense lawyer Evan W. Talley filed a motion to withdraw as the defendants’ lawyer on September 21, 2022.

The court ordered counsel to serve the motion and this Order on the defendants by September 23 and file proof of service by September 26. Any opposition was due September 29, and any reply was due October 4. Until the court grants the motion, Talley remains the lawyer officially representing the defendants. The court also warned that Ray Tennyson LLC and Amazing Paint Party LLC must appear through a lawyer and that default judgment may be entered against them if new counsel does not appear.

Judge Jesse M. Furman adjourned the initial pretrial conference from October 3 to November 7, 2022, at 3:15 p.m. The order did not decide the motion to withdraw.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson v. Tennyson · No. 1:22-cv-05683
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Sept. 22, 2022

Background

On September 21, 2022, Evan W. Talley, counsel for the defendants, filed a motion to withdraw as their counsel. The order addresses service of that motion, deadlines for responding to it, the defendants’ representation, and the initial pretrial conference.

Court’s directives

The court ordered that, by September 23, defense counsel serve the defendants with:

- the motion to withdraw and any supporting documents; and - a copy of the order.

Counsel had to file proof of service on the docket by September 26. Any opposition from the plaintiff or defendants was due by September 29, and any reply was due by October 4.

The court stated that, unless and until it grants the motion, Evan Talley remains counsel of record and the case must proceed as scheduled. If the defendants had obtained new counsel, that lawyer was directed to promptly file a notice of appearance.

The court also warned that a corporate entity, including a limited liability company, may appear in federal court only through counsel. It specifically identified Ray Tennyson LLC and Amazing Paint Party LLC and warned that default judgment may be entered against them if new counsel fails to appear for them.

Pretrial conference and effect of the order

The court adjourned the initial pretrial conference from October 3, 2022, to November 7, 2022, at 3:15 p.m. This order set procedures for the pending withdrawal motion but did not decide that motion or the underlying dispute. Judge Jesse M. Furman signed the order on September 22, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.