Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 22, 2022

J.F. v. New York City Department of Education

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-02462
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In J.F. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled case, subject to restoration by October 24, 2022.

Who this affects

J.F., her minor child, and the New York City Department of Education.

What happened

J.F., individually and on behalf of her minor child, sued the New York City Department of Education. The Department told the court that the parties had reached a settlement.

The court discontinued the case without costs to any party. The case could be restored to the court’s calendar if an application was made by October 24, 2022.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the dismissal would be with prejudice if no restoration application was filed by that date. All other dates and deadlines were adjourned indefinitely.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
J.F. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:22-cv-02462
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Sept. 22, 2022

Background

J.F. brought the case individually and on behalf of her minor child against the New York City Department of Education. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Court’s Action

The court received a letter from the Department stating that the parties had reached a settlement. The court therefore ordered that the case be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application to restore the case was made by October 24, 2022.

If no restoration application was made by that date, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order on September 22, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.