Rose v. The State of New York
- Analisa Torres
- 1:21-cv-03164
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Rose v. City of New York Department of Correction, Judge Torres adopted the recommendation, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Darrell Rose and the defendants named in the order: The City of New York Department of Correction, Deputy Guity, Captain Chacara, Correctional Officer #17482, and R. Ksetka.
What happened
In Rose v. The City of New York Department of Correction, Darrell Rose was the plaintiff, and the defendants were the department and five individuals identified in the order.
The court received no objections to a recommended decision from Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. After reviewing that recommendation for clear error, the court found none and adopted it in full. The opinion does not state the recommendation’s underlying reasoning.
Judge Analisa Torres granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the case with prejudice. The clerk was directed to close the case and mail the order to Rose, who was representing himself.
The detailed version
- Rose v. The State of New York · No. 1:21-cv-03164
- Analisa Torres
- Sept. 26, 2022
Background
Darrell Rose sued The City of New York Department of Correction, Deputy Guity, Captain Chacara, Correctional Officer #17482, and R. Ksetka. The opinion does not describe the factual allegations or legal claims.
Recommendation and Review
The court had received a report and recommendation from Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. No party objected. Judge Torres reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found none. The court adopted the recommendation in its entirety.
Ruling
The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the case with prejudice. The opinion does not state the grounds for dismissal because it adopts the recommendation without explaining its underlying analysis. The clerk was directed to terminate the motion, mail a copy of the order to Rose pro se, meaning without a lawyer, and close the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.