Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 27, 2022

Rose v. The State of New York

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:21-cv-03164
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Rose v. New York City Department of Correction, Judge Torres adopted the report and recommendation, granted defendants’ dismissal motion, and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Darrell Rose’s case was dismissed with prejudice, and the defendants’ motion to dismiss was granted.

What happened

In Darrell Rose v. The City of New York Department of Correction and others, the defendants moved to dismiss the case. The judgment does not describe the underlying claims or the parties’ arguments.

The court received no objections to the report and recommendation prepared by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. It reviewed that recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Analisa Torres adopted the recommendation in its entirety, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, and dismissed the case with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rose v. The State of New York · No. 1:21-cv-03164
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Sept. 27, 2022

Background

Darrell Rose brought this case against the City of New York Department of Correction, Deputy Guity, Captain Chacara, Correctional Officer #17482, and R. Ksetka. The judgment does not state the claims or explain the events underlying the case. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss.

Report and Recommendation

Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang issued a report and recommendation addressing the motion. The court received no objections. It reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Ruling

Judge Analisa Torres adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety. The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the case with prejudice. The judgment cites the court’s September 26, 2022 order for the reasons supporting that result, but that order is not included in the provided text.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.