Hughes v. United States
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:22-cv-05839
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Hughes v. United States, Judge Caproni converted Hughes’s sentence-execution motion into a § 2241 petition and transferred it to Pennsylvania.
John Hughes, the Bureau of Prisons, and the United States Attorney’s Offices for the Southern District of New York and the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
What happened
John Hughes, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in Allenwood, filed a motion seeking to correct or reduce the terms of his prison sentence. The motion cited 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b)(1)(2). The case is Hughes v. United States.
The court explained that a challenge to how a prison sentence is carried out must be filed as a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. It also explained that such a petition must name the applicable Bureau of Prisons warden and be filed in the district where the inmate is incarcerated. The court had given Hughes an opportunity to object to changing his motion into a § 2241 petition and transferring it, but he did not object.
The court ordered the clerk to convert Hughes’s motion into a § 2241 petition and transfer the case to the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Judge Valerie Caproni also directed the clerk to notify the relevant United States Attorney’s Offices and mail the order to Hughes, who was representing himself.
The detailed version
- Hughes v. United States · No. 1:22-cv-05839
- Valerie Caproni
- Sept. 29, 2022
Background
John Hughes, identified as an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in Allenwood, filed a motion seeking to correct or reduce the terms of his prison sentence. The motion invoked 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b)(1)(2). The opinion states that Hughes filed the motion on July 7, 2022.
Conversion to a § 2241 proceeding
The court explained that a challenge to the execution of a prison sentence—that is, how the sentence is being carried out—must be brought as a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court further explained that such a petition must be brought against the applicable Bureau of Prisons warden in the federal district where the inmate is incarcerated.
Because converting the motion into a § 2241 petition could create obstacles for a later or successive petition, the court had to give Hughes an opportunity to reject the conversion. On July 20, 2022, the court ordered that it would convert the motion and transfer the case to the Middle District of Pennsylvania unless Hughes objected by August 31, 2022. The opinion states that Hughes did not object.
Disposition
The court ordered the clerk to convert Hughes’s motion into a petition under § 2241 and transfer the case to the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The order did not decide whether Hughes was entitled to correction or reduction of his sentence. The court also directed the clerk to notify the Criminal Divisions of the United States Attorney’s Offices for the Southern District of New York and the Middle District of Pennsylvania, mail a copy of the order to Hughes as a self-represented litigant, and record the mailing on the docket.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.