Mave Hotel Investors LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
- Analisa Torres
- 1:21-cv-08743
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Mave Hotel Investors v. Certain Underwriters, Judge Torres adopted the report and recommendation and granted U.S. Bank’s motion to intervene.
U.S. Bank National Association was allowed to intervene in the case; the court’s order also affected the pending docketed motion.
What happened
Mave Hotel Investors LLC sued Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, and HDI Global Specialty SE. U.S. Bank National Association asked to join the case, and a magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the request be granted.
No party objected to the report. The court reviewed it for clear error and found none.
Judge Analisa Torres adopted the report and recommendation in full and granted U.S. Bank National Association’s motion to intervene. The clerk was directed to terminate the motion on the docket.
The detailed version
- Mave Hotel Investors LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London · No. 1:21-cv-08743
- Analisa Torres
- Sept. 29, 2022
Background
Mave Hotel Investors LLC brought the case against Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, and HDI Global Specialty SE. U.S. Bank National Association filed a motion to intervene, meaning a request to join the case as a party. Magistrate Judge James L. Cott issued a report and recommendation addressing that motion.
Ruling
No party objected to the report and recommendation. Judge Analisa Torres reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found none. The court adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety.
Disposition
The court granted U.S. Bank National Association’s motion to intervene. The clerk was directed to terminate the motion listed at docket entry 29.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.