Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd.
- Rochon
- 1:21-cv-04878
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 20
In Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd., Judge Rochon extended a filing deadline and ordered paper service on unrepresented defendants.
All parties were affected by the extended joint-letter deadline, while the specific service and mailing directions principally affected Plaintiffs, JaJay Moto, Inc., and Ma Kam Fung.
What happened
In Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd., the court addressed case-management steps involving two unrepresented defendants, JaJay Moto, Inc. and Ma Kam Fung.
The court extended the deadline for the parties’ joint letter from October 7, 2022, to October 14, 2022. It also directed the plaintiffs to file the letter electronically and serve it on the unrepresented defendants, and directed the Clerk to mail those defendants copies of the order and the judge’s practice rules.
This was a procedural order, not a decision on the underlying dispute. The order was issued by Judge Rochon.
The detailed version
- Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd. · No. 1:21-cv-04878
- Rochon
- Sept. 29, 2022
Order
The court addressed procedures arising from the pro se status—that is, proceeding without a lawyer—of Defendants JaJay Moto, Inc. and Ma Kam Fung. The court directed all counsel and the unrepresented defendants to familiarize themselves with the court’s individual rules, including its rules for civil cases involving parties without lawyers.
The court extended the deadline for the parties to file a joint letter under the court’s September 23, 2022 order. The deadline changed from October 7, 2022, to October 14, 2022, so that all parties, including the unrepresented defendants, could confer and prepare the letter. The plaintiffs were ordered to file the joint letter on the court’s electronic filing system and serve it on the unrepresented defendants when filing it.
The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the September 29 order, the September 23 order, and Judge Rochon’s individual practice rules to JaJay Moto, Inc. and Ma Kam Fung at the addresses listed in the order. The provided text identifies the judge as Jennifer L. Rochon throughout the order and attached rules, but the signature block reads “Chai L. ROCHON.” This order addresses scheduling and service procedures; it does not decide the parties’ underlying claims or defenses.
Attached Practice Rules
The text also includes Judge Rochon’s general practice rules for civil cases and civil cases involving unrepresented parties. Those rules cover communications with the court, filing and service, discovery, motions, trial materials, sealed filings, settlement agreements, and electronic devices. They are included as guidance and do not represent additional rulings on the merits of this case.
Read the full 20-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.