Moses v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.
- Carter
- 1:18-cv-01200
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Moses v. Consolidated Edison, Judge Carter granted ConEd’s motion to dismiss 116 workers’ time-barred wage claims.
The ruling affected the FLSA claims of 116 opt-in plaintiffs whose work for Griffin ended before July 20, 2017, or who did not work on a ConEd project after that date.
What happened
Moses v. Consolidated Edison is a proposed group lawsuit by workers employed as flagmen or flaggers. They alleged that Griffin Industries and Griffin Securities failed to pay required wage rates and sued ConEd as a claimed joint employer. The workers brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law.
ConEd asked the court to dismiss the Fair Labor Standards Act claims of 116 workers who had joined the case. ConEd argued that those claims were filed too late. The court applied the law’s two-year deadline, which can extend to three years for willful violations, and concluded that claims involving work before July 20, 2017, were too late.
The court granted ConEd’s motion to dismiss the claims of workers who either stopped working for Griffin before July 20, 2017, or did not work on a ConEd project after that date. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. directed the clerk to terminate the motion from the docket.
The detailed version
- Moses v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. · No. 1:18-cv-01200
- Carter
- Sept. 30, 2022
Background
Raven Moses and other workers employed as flagmen or flaggers brought a proposed class action against several defendants, including Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (ConEd). They alleged that Griffin Industries and Griffin Securities (together, Griffin) failed to pay wages at the required prevailing rates. They sued ConEd under a joint-employer theory. A magistrate judge had previously conditionally certified a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the federal law governing certain wage and hour claims.
Motion and arguments
ConEd moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), which permits dismissal when a complaint does not adequately state a legal claim. ConEd sought dismissal of the FLSA claims of 116 opt-in plaintiffs, meaning workers who had joined the collective action. ConEd argued that their claims were barred by the statute of limitations, the legal deadline for bringing a claim. Plaintiffs argued that dismissal would be premature because their motion for class certification had not been decided and discovery was still ongoing. The opinion states that Plaintiffs did not argue that additional discovery would change the employment dates they had provided to ConEd.
Court’s analysis
The FLSA generally has a two-year limitations period. The period may extend to three years when the alleged violation was willful. Using the three-year period as the outside date, the court relied on the earlier conclusion that FLSA claims for work performed for ConEd before July 20, 2017, were time-barred. The court found no reason to reach a different conclusion.
Ruling
The court granted ConEd’s motion to dismiss. The ruling covered the FLSA claims of plaintiffs who either stopped working for Griffin before July 20, 2017, or continued working for Griffin but did not work on a ConEd project after July 20, 2017. The clerk was directed to terminate the motion identified as ECF No. 603.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.