Cromitie v. Carlisle Etcetera, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-05937
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Cromitie v. Carlisle Etcetera, LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after settlement discussions, subject to possible restoration by November 3, 2022.
Seana Cromitie and Carlisle Etcetera, LLC; the action was discontinued subject to the stated settlement-memorialization and restoration conditions.
What happened
Seana Cromitie brought this action against Carlisle Etcetera, LLC, and informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and requested restoration by November 3, 2022.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Cromitie v. Carlisle Etcetera, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-05937
- Vyskocil
- Oct. 3, 2022
Background
Seana Cromitie filed the action against Carlisle Etcetera, LLC on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. The court received Cromitie's letter stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Court's Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court's calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the action had to be made by November 3, 2022.
The court further ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order on October 3, 2022.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.