Rich v. State of New York
- Analisa Torres
- 1:21-cv-03835
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Rich v. Miller, Judge Torres denied Rich’s motion to strike after adopting the report and recommendation.
Benjamin Samuel Rich, formerly known as Samuel Guillaume, and Detectives Michael Miller and Vincent Corrando; Rich’s motion to strike was denied.
What happened
In Benjamin Samuel Rich, formerly known as Samuel Guillaume, v. Detectives Michael Miller and Vincent Corrando, the court considered a report and recommendation after receiving no objections.
The court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error and found none. It adopted the report and recommendation in full, but this order does not describe its underlying reasoning or recommendation.
Judge Analisa Torres denied Rich’s motion to strike. The clerk was directed to close the motion and mail a copy of the order to Rich, who was representing himself.
The detailed version
- Rich v. State of New York · No. 1:21-cv-03835
- Analisa Torres
- Oct. 4, 2022
Background
Benjamin Samuel Rich, formerly known as Samuel Guillaume, sued Detective Michael Miller and Detective Vincent Corrando. The opinion concerns Rich’s motion to strike and a report and recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein. The opinion does not state what Rich sought to strike or describe the report’s underlying recommendation.
Court’s Analysis
No party filed objections to the report and recommendation. Judge Analisa Torres reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found none. The court therefore adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety.
Ruling
The court denied Rich’s motion to strike. It directed the clerk to terminate the motion at ECF Nos. 73–74 and mail a copy of the order to Rich, who was proceeding without a lawyer.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.