Delshah 60 Ninth, LLC v. Free People of PA LLC
- Jesse Furman
- 1:20-cv-05905
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Delshah 60 Ninth v. Free People, Judge Furman granted reconsideration and reinstated Free People’s failure-to-mitigate defense.
Delshah 60 Ninth, LLC and Free People of PA LLC, particularly Free People’s ability to assert failure to mitigate as a defense concerning damages.
What happened
Delshah 60 Ninth, LLC v. Free People of PA LLC concerns a commercial rent dispute from the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The court had previously granted Delshah summary judgment on liability and sent damages to a magistrate judge for review.
Free People asked the court to reconsider its decision treating the failure-to-mitigate defense as abandoned. Free People argued that neither side addressed that defense in summary-judgment papers and that the magistrate judge’s recommendation did not discuss it. The court agreed that it had made an error, while noting that the defense concerns damages rather than liability.
Judge Furman granted Free People’s motion for reconsideration and reinstated the failure-to-mitigate defense. The court said the defense could be considered during the damages review and directed the clerk to terminate the reconsideration motion from the docket.
The detailed version
- Delshah 60 Ninth, LLC v. Free People of PA LLC · No. 1:20-cv-05905
- Jesse Furman
- Oct. 4, 2022
Background
This opinion concerns a commercial rent dispute arising from the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. In an earlier order, the court granted summary judgment for Delshah on liability and referred damages to Magistrate Judge Sarah Cave for an inquest, meaning a proceeding to determine the amount of damages. In that earlier order, the court treated several affirmative defenses in Free People’s answer as abandoned, including the defense that Delshah had failed to mitigate its damages.
Motion for Reconsideration
Free People moved for reconsideration of the decision treating the failure-to-mitigate defense as abandoned. It argued that neither party raised the defense in the summary-judgment briefing and that Magistrate Judge Cave’s Report and Recommendation did not address it.
The court agreed that it had erred in treating the defense as abandoned. It explained that the issue had not been raised in Delshah’s summary-judgment briefing or in Delshah’s objections to the Report and Recommendation. The court also noted that failure to mitigate concerns damages, not liability, and that Delshah agreed the mitigation issue could be addressed during the damages inquest under the parties’ lease.
Ruling
Judge Furman granted Free People’s motion for reconsideration. The court reinstated the failure-to-mitigate defense and directed the clerk to terminate the reconsideration motion from the docket. This opinion did not change the earlier summary judgment on liability or decide the amount of damages.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.