Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 6, 2022

Lopez v. Nelson Management Group LTD.

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:21-cv-00865
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Lopez v. Nelson Management Group: Judge Furman granted a three-week extension for submitting the parties’ settlement materials.

Who this affects

The parties to David Lopez’s case, including the defendants and plaintiff’s counsel, were affected by the extended deadline for submitting settlement materials.

What happened

In David Lopez v. Nelson Management Group, Ltd., et al., the defendants asked for three more weeks to submit the parties’ settlement agreement and related materials for the court’s fairness review. The request sought to move the deadline from October 6 to October 27, 2022.

The defendants said they were reviewing draft settlement documents and that the request was their first extension request. Plaintiff’s counsel agreed to the extension, and the request would not affect other deadlines.

Judge Jesse M. Furman granted the application and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate ECF No. 48. The order addressed only the submission deadline and did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lopez v. Nelson Management Group LTD. · No. 1:21-cv-00865
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Oct. 6, 2022

Background

The defendants requested a three-week extension of the deadline for the parties to file their settlement agreement and joint submissions for the court’s fairness review. The existing deadline was October 6, and the requested new deadline was October 27.

The defendants stated that this was the first request to extend the deadline. They said the parties had reached an agreement, that draft settlement paperwork was being reviewed, and that plaintiff’s counsel consented to the request. They also stated that no other dates or deadlines would be affected.

Ruling

Judge Jesse M. Furman granted the application. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate ECF No. 48. The order did not address the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute or approve the settlement itself.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.