Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 6, 2022

Hollis v. The All American Bar on First, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:22-cv-01466
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hollis v. The All American Bar, Judge Abrams ordered the parties to consider transferring all further proceedings to a magistrate judge.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendants must discuss consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction and either submit a consent form or notify the court that they do not consent within two weeks.

What happened

In Hollis v. The All American Bar on First, Inc. and related defendants, the court said mediation had been unsuccessful. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The parties must discuss whether they both agree to let Magistrate Judge Lehrburger handle all further proceedings. If they agree, they must submit a completed consent form within two weeks; otherwise, they must jointly notify the court without identifying who declined.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that no adverse consequences would result from refusing consent and reminded the parties that most settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act require court approval.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hollis v. The All American Bar on First, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-01466
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Oct. 6, 2022

Background

The court stated that mediation had taken place but had not succeeded. The opinion does not describe the parties’ underlying claims or resolve them.

Order concerning a magistrate judge

To conserve resources, promote efficiency, and seek a faster resolution, the court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would voluntarily consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to having Magistrate Judge Lehrburger conduct all further proceedings. If all parties consent, they must submit a completed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form within two weeks of the order. The transfer would take effect only if the court approves the form.

If any party does not consent, the parties must file a joint letter within two weeks stating that they do not consent, without identifying the party or parties who declined. The order states that withholding consent will not result in adverse consequences. If the magistrate judge conducts all proceedings after consent, any appeal would go directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Other reminder and disposition

The court reminded the parties that, in most cases, settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act require court approval. The order is a case-management directive about possible consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction; it does not grant or deny a merits motion and does not resolve the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.