Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 7, 2022

R&G Enterprises, Inc. v. Choi

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:19-cv-11699
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In R&G Enterprises v. Choi, Judge Engelmayer granted default judgment, denied fee-free appeal status, and closed the case.

Who this affects

R&G Enterprises, Inc. and the defendants, including Soo Jeong Choi; the case was closed after the court granted default judgment.

What happened

R&G Enterprises, Inc. v. Soo Jeong Choi, et al. ended when the court granted R&G Enterprises’ motion for default judgment.

The order does not identify the underlying claims, requested relief, or reasons supporting the judgment; it refers to a separate opinion and order dated October 7, 2022.

Judge Paul Engelmayer’s court declined to issue an appeal certificate, stated that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, denied fee-free status for an appeal, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
R&G Enterprises, Inc. v. Choi · No. 1:19-cv-11699
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Oct. 7, 2022

What the court decided

The court granted the motion for default judgment. The order states that this decision was based on the reasons given in the court’s separate Opinion and Order dated October 7, 2022.

What the available text says about the dispute

The provided order does not describe the underlying claims, the relief sought, the defendants’ conduct, or the court’s substantive reasoning. It identifies R&G Enterprises, Inc. as the plaintiff and Soo Jeong Choi and other defendants as the defendants.

Appeal-related rulings and case status

The court stated that the parties’ failure to file written objections precluded appellate review. It declined to issue a certificate of appealability, certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The case was closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.