Rodriguez v. HKS Construction Corp
- John Koeltl
- 1:20-cv-05005
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Rodriguez v. HKS Construction Corp., Judge Wang ordered an evidence-based damages inquest after Defendants’ default.
The Plaintiffs must submit, serve, and document their proposed damages and any requested attorney’s fees and costs. The Defendants may oppose those submissions and may request a damages hearing.
What happened
In Rodriguez v. HKS Construction Corp., the court ordered Plaintiffs to prepare for an inquest after Defendants’ default. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or decide the amount of damages.
By November 11, 2022, Plaintiffs had to submit proposed factual findings, legal conclusions, and a memorandum supporting their damages request with documents or affidavits. They also had to provide support for any requested attorney’s fees and costs, serve the materials on Defendants, and file proof of service.
Defendants could file opposition papers by December 2, 2022. The court said it might decide the damages inquest using written submissions alone, unless a party requested a hearing and explained why one was necessary. Judge Ona T. Wang signed the order.
The detailed version
- Rodriguez v. HKS Construction Corp · No. 1:20-cv-05005
- John Koeltl
- Oct. 11, 2022
Background
The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang for an inquest following a default. An inquest is a proceeding used here to determine the damages and related amounts owed after the default. This order does not state the underlying causes of action, identify the specific defaulted defendants, or decide the amount of damages.
Required submissions
The court ordered Plaintiffs to file two items by November 11, 2022: proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and an inquest memorandum presenting proof of damages. Proposed damages figures had to be supported by documentary evidence or one or more affidavits. Plaintiffs also had to include documentation supporting any requested attorney’s fees and costs.
Plaintiffs had to serve these documents on Defendants and file proof of service on the docket by November 11, 2022. They separately had to serve a copy of the order on Defendants and file proof of that service by October 18, 2022.
Opposition and possible hearing
Defendants’ opposition papers, if any, were due December 2, 2022. The court notified the parties that it might conduct the damages inquest solely through written submissions. Any party seeking an evidentiary hearing had to request one in its papers, explain why a hearing was necessary, and describe the additional evidence that would be presented.
Disposition
Judge Ona T. Wang entered an order setting deadlines and procedures for the post-default damages inquest. The order did not enter a damages award or rule on the merits of the underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.