Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 12, 2022

Robinson v. De Niro

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:19-cv-09156
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Robinson v. De Niro, Judge Liman adopted the recommendation and denied Defendants’ motion for Rule 11 sanctions.

Who this affects

The ruling affected Defendants’ motion for sanctions and Plaintiff’s response to that motion. The Court denied the motion and adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

What happened

In Robinson v. De Niro, a magistrate judge recommended denying Defendants’ request for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Defendants initially objected to that recommendation but later withdrew their objection, and Plaintiff consented to the withdrawal.

Judge Liman found no clear error, adopted the recommendation in full, and denied Defendants’ motion for sanctions.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Robinson v. De Niro · No. 1:19-cv-09156
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Oct. 12, 2022

Background

Magistrate Judge Katharine Parker issued a Report and Recommendation on July 13, 2022, recommending that the Court deny Defendants’ motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties were given 14 days to object.

Defendants filed a single objection on July 27, 2022. On October 11, 2022, Defendants filed a letter withdrawing that objection. Plaintiff consented to the withdrawal.

Court’s Analysis

The Court explained that a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. When a party makes a timely objection, the district judge reviews the challenged portion independently. When there is no objection, the district judge reviews the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake.

Because Defendants withdrew their objection, the Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error. The Court found none.

Ruling

Judge Liman adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and denied Defendants’ motion for sanctions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.