Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 12, 2022

Brunckhorst III v. Bischoff

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:21-cv-04362
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Brunckhorst III v. Bischoff, Judge Cronan granted Bischoff’s motions to compel discovery and extend fact-discovery deadlines.

Who this affects

Eric Bischoff obtained the requested discovery and additional time for fact discovery; Frank Brunckhorst III was ordered to produce documents and answer interrogatories concerning his employment.

What happened

In Brunckhorst III v. Bischoff, Eric Bischoff asked the court to require Frank Brunckhorst III to produce documents and answer questions about Brunckhorst’s employment at Boar’s Head Provisions Co., Inc. and its affiliates.

Bischoff sought employment-related materials dating back to 2003. Brunckhorst offered to provide materials from January 1, 2020, onward, but Bischoff rejected that limit. The court found the requested information relevant to whether Brunckhorst was an “Active Employee” in May 2021 under a Shareholder Agreement concerning the disputed shares, and found the requests reasonable in scope.

Judge John P. Cronan granted the motion to compel and extended the fact-discovery deadline to December 15, 2022. The court also extended all other discovery deadlines by forty-five days and directed the Clerk of Court to close the motions pending at Docket Numbers 181, 184, and 187.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brunckhorst III v. Bischoff · No. 1:21-cv-04362
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Oct. 12, 2022

Background

Defendant Eric Bischoff moved to compel discovery from Plaintiff Frank Brunckhorst III and sought an extension of the fact-discovery deadline. Discovery is the pretrial exchange of information, documents, and answers to written questions between parties.

Bischoff requested documents and answers to interrogatories—written questions requiring responses—about Brunckhorst’s employment at Boar’s Head Provisions Co., Inc. and its affiliates. Bischoff sought materials dating back to 2003 and argued that Brunckhorst should either provide the information or be barred from testifying that the nature of his employment changed over time. Brunckhorst offered to produce materials from January 1, 2020, onward, but Bischoff rejected that proposal.

Court’s Analysis

The court applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1), which permits discovery of nonprivileged information that is relevant to a claim or defense and proportionate to the needs of the case. The court agreed that the requested materials and responses were relevant to whether Brunckhorst was an “Active Employee” in May 2021 under a Shareholder Agreement governing the transfer of the disputed shares. The court also found Bischoff’s requests proportional to the needs of the case.

Ruling

The court granted Bischoff’s motion to compel Brunckhorst to produce the requested documents and answer the interrogatories. The court also granted the request to extend the deadline for fact discovery, setting that deadline for December 15, 2022. All other discovery deadlines were extended by forty-five days. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the motions pending at Docket Numbers 181, 184, and 187.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.