Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 13, 2022

Broadnax v. Hallet

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:21-cv-02926
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Broadnax v. Hallet, Judge Broderick ordered the pro se plaintiff to file an amended complaint naming unidentified defendants by November 14, 2022.

Who this affects

Cleveland Broadnax, who was ordered to file an amended complaint naming the defendants by November 14, 2022; the unidentified defendants whose identities and service information were being provided.

What happened

In Broadnax v. Hallet, Cleveland Broadnax sued Warden Michelle Hallet and other defendants. Several defendants were not fully identified or served, and Broadnax asked for help identifying them.

The court ordered New York City and Correctional Health Services to find the unidentified defendants’ names and service addresses. The defendants reported that they had provided Broadnax with that information.

Judge Broderick ordered Broadnax to file an amended complaint fully naming the defendants by November 14, 2022. The amended complaint would replace the original complaint rather than add to it, and the Clerk was directed to mail the order to Broadnax.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Broadnax v. Hallet · No. 1:21-cv-02926
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Oct. 13, 2022

Background

Cleveland Broadnax filed the complaint on April 5, 2021, against Warden Michelle Hallet and other defendants. The New York City Department of Correction reported that some defendants could not be served because Warden Hallet was no longer employed there, there was no Deputy Sanchez at the identified facility, there were no matches for Defendant Sans, and multiple officers matched the names Grant, Vincent, and Lubin.

Broadnax later stated that he intended to continue the case against the remaining unidentified defendants and asked for help identifying them. The court ordered New York City and Correctional Health Services to determine the unidentified defendants’ names and the addresses where they could be served. The defendants later reported that they had identified Defendants Grant, Vincent, and Lubin and had provided Broadnax with the full names, shield numbers, and service addresses for Defendants Sanchez and Sands.

Order

The court found that the defendants had complied with its identification order. It ordered Broadnax to file an amended complaint fully naming the defendants by November 14, 2022. The amended complaint would replace, rather than supplement, the original complaint. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail a copy of the order to the pro se plaintiff. Judge Vernon S. Broderick did not decide the underlying claims in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.