Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.OtherFiled Oct. 13, 2022

Husenovski v. Absalom

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:21-cv-05124
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureContractFee Petition
In one sentence

In Husenovski v. City of New York, Judge Engelmayer directed the City to respond to counsel’s request for unpaid interest and fees by October 18, 2022.

Who this affects

The order affects the City of New York and the plaintiff’s attorneys, Jeffrey A. Rothman and Jason Leventhal, by requiring the City to respond to their request for additional interest and attorney’s fees.

What happened

In Husenovski v. City of New York, the plaintiff’s attorneys asked the court to require the City of New York to pay additional interest on late payments of attorneys’ fees and costs. The payments arose from a settlement and a court-approved agreement requiring the City to pay $11,774 to Jason Leventhal and $9,226 to Jeffrey A. Rothman.

The attorneys said the City paid the fees and costs late and provided interest checks for less than the amounts they calculated under New York law. Rothman requested an additional $260.63 for himself, $332.73 for Leventhal, and attorney’s fees for time spent preparing the request. The opinion does not decide whether the requested interest or attorney’s fees are owed.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer directed the City of New York to respond to the letter by October 18, 2022. The order therefore required a response but did not grant or deny the requested payments or fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Husenovski v. Absalom · No. 1:21-cv-05124
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Oct. 13, 2022

Background

The opinion consists of a letter from Jeffrey A. Rothman, who stated that he and Jason Leventhal represented the plaintiff. The plaintiff had accepted a court-rule settlement offer of $15,001 plus reasonable attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs through the date of the offer for the plaintiff’s federal claims.

The attorneys and the City later agreed on the amount of fees, expenses, and costs. The court approved that agreement on April 7, 2022. The agreement required the City to pay $11,774 to Leventhal and $9,226 to Rothman.

Rothman stated that the attorneys provided the executed settlement documents to opposing counsel on April 1, 2022. He argued that New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 5003-a(b) required payment within 90 days, by June 30, 2022. According to the letter, the checks were dated August 22, 2022 and received in late August.

Requested relief

Rothman argued that interest was due at 9% per year, calculated from April 1, 2022 through August 22, 2022. He calculated that the proper interest was $325.21 on his $9,226 payment and $415.15 on Leventhal’s $11,774 payment. He stated that the City sent him $64.58 in interest and Leventhal $82.42, leaving claimed shortfalls of $260.63 and $332.73.

Rothman also requested attorney’s fees for 2.5 hours spent preparing the letter and any additional related filings. He cited 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and the court’s inherent authority as grounds for that request. The opinion does not resolve the legal arguments or determine whether any additional interest or attorney’s fees are required.

Court’s action

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer directed the City of New York to submit a response to the letter by October 18, 2022. The order did not state that the court granted or denied the request for additional interest or attorney’s fees. It also did not determine the amount, if any, that the City must pay.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.