Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 13, 2022

Cordero v. Elezaj & Sons Realty Associates, LLC

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:21-cv-06899
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cordero v. Elezaj & Sons Realty Associates, LLC, Judge Koeltl granted a two-week extension to file a settlement-approval motion.

Who this affects

Candelario Cordero and the defendants—Elezaj & Sons Realty Associates, LLC, Marash Elezaj, and Kola Elezaj—were affected by the extension of the settlement-approval filing deadline.

What happened

Candelario Cordero sued Elezaj & Sons Realty Associates, LLC, Marash Elezaj, and Kola Elezaj for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court had directed Cordero to submit a motion seeking approval of the settlement as to his Fair Labor Standards Act claims by October 14, 2022. Cordero, with the defendants’ consent, requested a two-week extension because the parties were still resolving settlement terms and needed time to sign the formal agreement.

Judge John G. Koeltl granted the application and extended the deadline to October 28, 2022. The opinion does not decide whether the alleged wage-law violations occurred or whether the settlement should ultimately be approved.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cordero v. Elezaj & Sons Realty Associates, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-06899
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
Oct. 13, 2022

Background

Candelario Cordero brought claims against Elezaj & Sons Realty Associates, LLC, Marash Elezaj, and Kola Elezaj for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law. The parties reached a settlement in principle. The court had ordered Cordero to submit a motion asking the court to approve the settlement of his FLSA claims by October 14, 2022.

Request

Cordero requested, with the defendants’ consent, a two-week extension of the deadline. The parties had made substantial progress negotiating the final settlement but were still working on certain terms and needed additional time to sign the formal settlement agreement. The request was identified as Cordero’s first request for this relief.

Ruling

The court granted the application. The deadline to submit the settlement-approval motion was extended from October 14, 2022, to October 28, 2022. This order addressed only the requested extension; it did not decide the merits of the wage claims or whether the settlement would ultimately be approved.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.