Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 14, 2022

Volman v. 64th & 3rd Enterprises LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:21-cv-10705
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Volman v. 64th & 3rd Enterprises, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by November 14, 2022.

Who this affects

Josef Volman and the two defendants were affected: the case was discontinued without costs, with a temporary opportunity to seek restoration by November 14, 2022, after which the dismissal would be with prejudice if no application was made.

What happened

In Volman v. 64th & 3rd Enterprises LLC, the plaintiff told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or settlement terms.

The court discontinued the case without imposing costs on any party. It allowed either party to seek restoration of the case to the court’s calendar by November 14, 2022.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. All other dates and deadlines were postponed without a new date.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Volman v. 64th & 3rd Enterprises LLC · No. 1:21-cv-10705
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Oct. 14, 2022

Background

The case was brought by Josef Volman against 64th & 3rd Enterprises LLC, doing business as Tony’s Di Napoli, and 64th Street - Third Avenue Associates, LLC. The court received a letter from Volman stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not state the underlying claims or the terms of the proposed settlement.

Court’s Order

The court ordered that the case be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar. An application to restore the case had to be made by November 14, 2022. If no such application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. The court also adjourned all other dates and deadlines without setting new dates.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.