Penafiel v. Baketivity Corp.
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:21-cv-11086
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Penafiel v. Baketivity Corp., Judge Karas ordered accurate information by October 19, 2022, after finding the parties’ submissions inconsistent.
The parties and plaintiff’s counsel were required to submit accurate information by October 19, 2022. The order states that the deadline would not be extended.
What happened
Penafiel v. Baketivity Corp. (DBA Baketivity) concerns information submitted to the court under the settlement-review procedure identified in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. Plaintiff’s counsel submitted a chart on October 14, 2022, to correct an error in the parties’ earlier submission.
The court said the new information was still inconsistent. It gave the parties until October 19, 2022, to submit accurate information and stated that it would not extend the deadline.
Judge Kenneth M. Karas entered this order on October 14, 2022. The order did not decide the parties’ underlying dispute or state what information was inconsistent.
The detailed version
- Penafiel v. Baketivity Corp. · No. 7:21-cv-11086
- Kenneth Karas
- Oct. 14, 2022
Background
The order concerns submissions made under the procedure discussed in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. Plaintiff’s counsel submitted a chart on October 14, 2022, to correct an error in the parties’ original motion under that procedure. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or describe the specific error.
Court’s Action
Judge Kenneth M. Karas stated that the newly submitted information remained inconsistent. The court ordered the parties to submit accurate information by October 19, 2022, and stated that there would be no extension of that deadline.
Disposition and Scope
The court issued a deadline order requiring corrected information. It did not rule on the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute, and the opinion does not state whether the court approved or rejected the parties’ original motion.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.