Carey v. Slaney
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-08649
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Carey v. Slaney, Judge Swain transferred the prisoner’s civil-rights case to Maine because New York was the wrong venue.
Alisa Carey and the five named defendants; the case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the District of Maine, and the Maine court was left to decide whether Carey could proceed without prepaying fees.
What happened
Alisa Carey, who is incarcerated and representing herself, sued Captain Slaney and four other defendants under a federal civil-rights law. She alleged that her constitutional rights were violated and said the relevant events occurred in Augusta, Maine.
The Southern District of New York ruled that venue was improper there because the defendants were located in Augusta and the alleged events occurred there. It transferred the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine, rather than dismissing it.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to transfer the case and closed the New York case. She also ruled that Carey could not appeal without paying the required fees because the appeal would not be taken in good faith; the Maine court would decide whether Carey could continue without paying filing fees.
The detailed version
- Carey v. Slaney · No. 1:22-cv-08649
- Laura Swain
- Oct. 19, 2022
Background
Alisa Carey, who is incarcerated at the Kennebec County Correctional Facility in Augusta, Maine, brought this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims against state actors for violating constitutional rights. She alleged that the defendants violated her constitutional rights and stated that she had been “denied court.” The defendants named in the complaint were Captain Slaney, Justice Michelle Lumbart, Bill Escongene, Mark Escongene, and Jessie Sanipas.
Venue analysis
The court explained that federal law generally permits a civil case to proceed in a district where the defendants reside, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority. Carey did not allege the defendants’ residences, but she alleged that the events occurred in Augusta, Maine, and that the defendants were employed there. The court stated that, based on the complaint, venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because the defendants were located in Augusta and the alleged events occurred there.
Disposition
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406, a court may transfer a case filed in the wrong venue when transfer serves the interests of justice. The court concluded that the claims arose in Augusta, which is in the District of Maine, and transferred the action there. The clerk was directed to transfer the case, and the order stated that the New York case was closed. A summons was not to issue from the Southern District of New York. The court left to the District of Maine the question whether Carey could proceed without prepaying fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.