Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 24, 2022

Rovio Entertainment Corporation v. Ace Air Art Inflatable Decorations Store

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-04139
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rovio Entertainment Corporation v. Ace Air Art Inflatable Decorations Store, Judge Rochon ordered service and set deadlines before deciding default judgment.

Who this affects

Rovio Entertainment Corporation and the defendants, including Ace Air Art Inflatable Decorations Store.

What happened

Rovio Entertainment Corporation asked the court for a default judgment against Ace Air Art Inflatable Decorations Store and other defendants. The request was based on the defendants’ failure to respond, but the court had not yet decided whether to grant it.

The court said Rovio had not filed the required proof that it served the defendants with the motion and supporting papers. It ordered Rovio to serve those materials and the order by October 26, 2022, and to file proof of service by that date.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon gave the defendants until November 16, 2022, to oppose the motion and ordered them to appear on December 15, 2022, to explain why default judgment should not be entered. The order did not grant or deny the default-judgment motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rovio Entertainment Corporation v. Ace Air Art Inflatable Decorations Store · No. 1:22-cv-04139
Judge
Rochon
Date
Oct. 24, 2022

Background

On October 5, 2022, Rovio Entertainment Corporation filed a motion seeking default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) and the Southern District of New York’s Local Civil Rule 55.2(b). A default judgment is a judgment that may be entered when a party has failed to respond or otherwise defend the case.

The court’s individual rules required Rovio to serve the motion and its supporting papers on the party against whom default judgment was sought and to file an affidavit showing that service within 14 days. The court stated that the deadline had passed and Rovio had not filed proof of service on the docket.

Court’s Order

The court ordered Rovio to serve the defendants, in the manner specified in the temporary restraining order, with the default-judgment motion, all supporting papers, and a copy of the order by October 26, 2022. Rovio also had to file proof of service by October 26, 2022.

The court ordered the defendants to file any opposition by November 16, 2022. It cautioned that corporate entities may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel and cited authority stating that default judgment may be entered against an entity that repeatedly fails to appear through counsel.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon also ordered the defendants to appear and explain on December 15, 2022, why an order granting default judgment should not be issued. The order stated that if a defendant appeared or opposed the motion before that date, the parties had to notify the court promptly; the court could then adjourn the conference or treat it as an initial pretrial conference for that defendant.

Disposition

The opinion is an order setting service, opposition, and appearance requirements. It does not grant or deny Rovio’s motion for default judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.