Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 24, 2022

Hyndman v. Small Business Administration

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:22-cv-04973
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hyndman v. Small Business Administration, Judge Halpern denied service on non-parties but extended service time for named defendants.

Who this affects

Dante Hyndman, the Small Business Administration, Isabel Guzman, Janet Yellen, and the United States of America were affected by the service ruling; the requested service on Merrick Garland and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York was denied.

What happened

In Hyndman v. Small Business Administration, Dante Hyndman asked the court to have the U.S. Marshals Service serve the defendants and also serve the U.S. Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

The court denied service on the Attorney General and U.S. Attorney because they were not named as defendants and Hyndman gave no reason to add them or issue summonses to them. The court treated his letter as a request to extend the time for serving the named defendants.

The court granted that request and extended the service period for 90 days from the order's date. Judge Philip M. Halpern directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion and mail the order to Hyndman.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hyndman v. Small Business Administration · No. 7:22-cv-04973
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Oct. 24, 2022

Background

Dante Hyndman asked the court to order the U.S. Marshals Service to issue and serve summonses on the defendants. He also requested service on Merrick Garland, the U.S. Attorney General, and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The opinion states that Hyndman had been allowed to proceed without paying the filing fee.

Rulings

The court denied the motion to the extent it sought service of the summons and complaint on the Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney. Neither person was named as a defendant, and Hyndman did not provide a reason to join them in the case or otherwise issue summonses to them.

The court construed Hyndman's letter as a request to extend the time for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the named defendants: the United States Small Business Administration; Isabel Guzman, the SBA Administrator; Janet Yellen, the Secretary of the Treasury; and the United States of America through the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The court granted that request and extended the time for service by 90 days from the date of the order, retroactively. The court reminded Hyndman that he was responsible for requesting another extension if service was not completed within that period.

Disposition

The court denied the request for service on the two non-parties and granted the request to extend the service period for the named defendants. Judge Philip M. Halpern also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion and mail a copy of the order to Hyndman.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.