Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 24, 2022

Cordero v. Pro Music Group, LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-04285
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Cordero v. Pro Music Group, Judge Rochon ordered settlement and standing discussions, followed by a report on settlement or a request for mediation or a status conference.

Who this affects

The parties, Rafael Cordero and Pro Music Group, LLC, must participate in the settlement discussions and submit the required joint letter.

What happened

Cordero v. Pro Music Group, LLC is a case brought by Rafael Cordero individually and for others described as similarly situated. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

The court ordered the parties to meet for at least one hour within 10 days after the order was served and make a good-faith attempt to settle. They were told to discuss whether Cordero had standing, meaning a sufficient legal basis to bring the case, and whether additional settlement discussions would help.

Within five more days, the parties must jointly tell the court whether they settled. If not, they must ask for mediation or a settlement conference with a magistrate judge, or request an initial status conference. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon did not decide the standing issue or the merits of the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cordero v. Pro Music Group, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-04285
Judge
Rochon
Date
Oct. 24, 2022

Background

The opinion identifies Rafael Cordero as the plaintiff, individually and on behalf of others described as similarly situated, and Pro Music Group, LLC as the defendant. It does not describe the claims or the underlying dispute.

Order

The court ordered the parties to meet and confer within 10 days after service of the order for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle the action. The parties must consider whether Cordero has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning whether he has a sufficient legal basis to bring the case. If they cannot settle, they must also discuss whether further settlement efforts through the court's mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive.

Within five additional days—15 days from the order—the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either referral to mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, with a preference stated between those options, or an initial status conference.

Effect

This order directs settlement-related steps and reporting. It does not decide whether Cordero has standing, resolve any claim, or determine the merits of the case. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued the order on October 24, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.