Hoyos v. Milio
- Gabriel Gorenstein
- 1:22-cv-01982
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Hoyos v. Milio, Magistrate Judge Gorenstein granted an extension to file a settlement letter until November 22, 2022.
Plaintiff Rodolfo Hoyos, the defendants, and their lawyers were affected by the extended deadline for submitting the joint settlement letter.
What happened
In Hoyos v. Milio, plaintiff Rodolfo Hoyos’s lawyers asked for more time to submit a joint letter about the parties’ settlement agreement. They requested an extension from October 25 through October 28, and said the request was made with the defendants’ lawyers’ consent.
The lawyers explained that the defendants’ counsel was gathering the clients’ signatures on the settlement agreement. They said the parties expected to file the joint letter by October 28 and that the request would not affect other deadlines.
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein granted an extension until November 22, 2022. He stated that no further extension would be granted unless the parties filed a formal motion with a sworn statement explaining the delay.
The detailed version
- Hoyos v. Milio · No. 1:22-cv-01982
- Gabriel Gorenstein
- Oct. 25, 2022
Background
Plaintiff Rodolfo Hoyos, through counsel, requested an extension of time to submit a joint letter concerning the parties’ settlement agreement. The requested extension was from October 25 through October 28, 2022. The letter stated that this was the second request of this type, that defendants’ counsel consented, and that the extension would not affect other scheduled deadlines.
Reason for the Request
The request stated that defendants’ counsel was gathering the defendants’ signatures on the settlement agreement. The parties anticipated filing the joint letter by October 28, 2022.
Ruling
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein granted an extension to November 22, 2022. The order stated that no further extension would be granted absent a formal motion supported by a sworn affidavit explaining the reason for the delay. The opinion does not state the underlying claims or whether the settlement was finally approved.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.