Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 27, 2022

Geron v. Graham

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:18-cv-00168-GHW-VF
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Geron v. Graham, Judge Woods denied Geron more time to object to a magistrate judge’s recommendation and denied free filing status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Roberto Geron, whose request for more time was denied and whose request to appeal without paying filing fees was also denied.

What happened

In Geron v. Graham, Roberto Geron asked for more time to object to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The report set a September 28, 2022 deadline.

Geron said he received the report on September 21, giving him seven days before the deadline. He did not request more time during that period. The court adopted the report on September 29, entered judgment on September 30, and received Geron’s written request on October 2.

Judge Gregory H. Woods denied the request because it came after the objection deadline, after the court adopted the report, and after judgment was entered. The court also found that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Geron permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Geron v. Graham · No. 1:18-cv-00168-GHW-VF
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Oct. 27, 2022

Background

Roberto Geron asked for an extension of time to object to Magistrate Judge Figueredo’s report and recommendation. The report stated that objections had to be submitted within 14 days of the report’s filing, with a deadline of September 28, 2022.

Geron stated that he received the report on September 21, seven days before the deadline. The court noted that he therefore had seven days to submit objections or, at minimum, ask for an extension. He did not request an extension during that period. The court adopted the report on September 29, 2022, and entered judgment on September 30, 2022. Geron’s request was written on October 2, 2022.

Ruling

Judge Gregory H. Woods denied Geron’s request for an extension because it was made after the objection deadline and after both the order adopting the report and recommendation and the judgment had been entered.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Geron permission to appeal without paying filing fees, sometimes called in forma pauperis status.

Scope of the Order

This opinion addresses only Geron’s request for more time and his ability to appeal this order without paying filing fees. The provided text does not explain the underlying claims or the substance of the report and recommendation.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.