Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 27, 2022

Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Keystone Foods Holdings Limited

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:19-cv-10125
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

Tyson Foods v. Keystone Foods Holding Limited, Judge Gorenstein granted applications to seal materials identified as confidential business information in discovery disputes.

Who this affects

The parties in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Keystone Foods Holding Limited and the materials covered by the sealing applications.

What happened

In Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Keystone Foods Holding Limited, the parties sought to keep certain materials from public view, representing that the redacted information was confidential business information.

The opinion concerns applications to seal filed at Docket Nos. 163 and 167, as modified by Docket No. 170. The court stated that only a modest showing is required to seal matters involving discovery disputes.

Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein granted the applications to seal based on the representation that the redacted material consisted of confidential business information.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Keystone Foods Holdings Limited · No. 1:19-cv-10125
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Oct. 27, 2022

Ruling

The court granted the applications to seal at Docket Nos. 163 and 167, as modified by Docket No. 170.

Reasoning

The court relied on the representation that the redacted material consisted of confidential business information. It also explained that only a modest showing is required to seal matters relating to discovery disputes.

Effect

The specified applications to seal were granted. The opinion does not identify the particular documents or information covered by the redactions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.