Coventry Capital US LLC v. EEA Life Settlements, Inc.
- Sarah Cave
- 1:17-cv-07417
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Coventry Capital US LLC v. EEA Life Settlements, Judge Cave granted EEA’s request to keep an exhibit under seal because it contained business and medical information.
EEA Life Settlements, Inc., Coventry Capital US LLC, selected parties with access to the filing, and individuals whose medical diagnoses appeared in the exhibit.
What happened
In Coventry Capital US LLC v. EEA Life Settlements, EEA asked to keep an exhibit attached to its opposition to Coventry’s motion to compel from public view. The exhibit contained Coventry’s requests for admission to EEA.
The exhibit included information about the companies’ negotiations and valuations of EEA’s life-settlement portfolio, as well as diagnoses of people whose policies were in that portfolio. The court considered the privacy interests and the risk of revealing confidential business and medical information.
Judge Sarah L. Cave granted EEA’s request. The exhibit will remain visible only to selected parties, and the clerk was directed to close the related filing.
The detailed version
- Coventry Capital US LLC v. EEA Life Settlements, Inc. · No. 1:17-cv-07417
- Sarah Cave
- Oct. 27, 2022
Background
Defendant EEA Life Settlements, Inc. filed a letter-motion asking the court to keep Exhibit A, identified as ECF No. 384-1, under seal. EEA had attached the exhibit to its opposition to Coventry Capital US LLC’s motion to compel. The exhibit consisted of Coventry’s requests for admission to EEA.
Reasoning
The court recognized a general presumption that court filings should be available to the public, but also considered the privacy interests opposing disclosure. The court stated that documents containing proprietary business information, including internal analyses, business strategies, or customer negotiations, may be kept from public view when disclosure could give competitors an unfair advantage. It also noted that courts regularly protect non-parties’ medical information and that the Southern District of New York’s local rules advise against placing such information in the public file.
The court found that Exhibit A revealed confidential information about EEA’s and Coventry’s negotiations and their respective valuations of EEA’s life-settlement portfolio. It also revealed diagnoses of individuals whose policies were in that portfolio.
Ruling
Judge Sarah L. Cave granted EEA Life Settlements, Inc.’s letter-motion seeking to file Exhibit A under seal. The document at ECF No. 384-1 was ordered to remain visible only to selected parties. The clerk was directed to close ECF No. 383.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.