Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 28, 2022

Investment Property Realty Group, LLC v. Block Real Estate Group LLC

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:22-cv-08943
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

Investment Property Realty Group v. Block Real Estate Group: Judge Woods issued a protective order governing confidential discovery in the case.

Who this affects

The parties to the action and other persons subject to the order who receive or access discovery materials designated as confidential, including attorneys, employees, vendors, witnesses, experts, mediators, and court personnel.

What happened

Investment Property Realty Group, LLC v. Block Real Estate Group LLC involves a request by all parties for an order protecting nonpublic and competitively sensitive information disclosed during discovery. The parties agreed to the order’s terms.

The order limits disclosure of information marked confidential, including certain financial information, business plans, personal information, and information about real estate transactions. It also sets procedures for marking materials, challenging confidentiality designations, filing confidential materials with the court, responding to subpoenas, and returning or destroying protected materials after the case ends.

Judge Gregory H. Woods found good cause for the order and issued it under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The order does not decide whether any material is actually confidential or admissible at trial, and violations may lead to contempt sanctions.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Investment Property Realty Group, LLC v. Block Real Estate Group LLC · No. 1:22-cv-08943
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Oct. 28, 2022

Background

All parties asked the court to enter a stipulated confidentiality agreement and protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). They sought protection for nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that might be disclosed during discovery. The court found good cause for an appropriately tailored order governing the pretrial phase of the case.

Protective-Order Requirements

The order requires the parties, their officers, agents, employees, attorneys, and other persons with actual notice of the order to protect discovery materials designated as confidential. A producing party may designate information that it reasonably and in good faith believes includes previously undisclosed financial information; information about ownership or control of a nonpublic company; business, product-development, or marketing plans; information about current or contemplated real estate transactions; personal or intimate information; and other categories later given confidential status by the court.

Confidential materials may be disclosed only to specified recipients, including the parties and their insurers, attorneys and litigation-support staff, outside vendors, mediators or arbitrators who sign a nondisclosure agreement, certain people identified on a document, potential witnesses who sign a nondisclosure agreement, experts or specialized advisers who sign a nondisclosure agreement, deposition stenographers, and the court. Counsel must provide the order to covered witnesses and experts before disclosure and retain their signed nondisclosure agreements.

The order establishes procedures for designating documents and deposition testimony, correcting an earlier failure to designate material, objecting to a confidentiality designation, and requesting additional restrictions such as attorneys’-eyes-only treatment. It also permits production in response to a lawful subpoena or other compulsory process, subject to notice to the producing party when legally permitted.

Court Filings and Sealing

A party filing confidential discovery material or a filing that reveals such material must publicly file a redacted version and submit an unredacted version under seal. A party seeking sealing must file an application and supporting declaration providing a particularized justification. The order warns that the court may unseal documents if the required specific findings showing that closure is essential and narrowly tailored cannot be made.

Duration and Enforcement

Within 60 days after the final disposition of the action, including appeals, recipients generally must return or destroy confidential discovery material and certify that they have done so. Litigation attorneys may retain archival copies of specified case materials, but those copies remain subject to the order. The order survives the end of the litigation, and the court retains jurisdiction as needed to enforce it or impose contempt sanctions.

Ruling

Judge Gregory H. Woods issued the stipulated confidentiality and protective order. The order does not determine that any designated material is actually confidential, does not waive discovery objections or privilege, and does not decide whether evidence will be admissible at trial.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.