Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 2, 2022

Maddy v. Blossom Kitchen & Bath Supply Corp.

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-05234
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Maddy v. Blossom Kitchen & Bath Supply Corp., Judge Rochon ordered settlement discussions and a joint status letter without deciding standing or the merits.

Who this affects

Veronica Maddy, Blossom Kitchen & Bath Supply Corp., and the parties’ required settlement and case-management process.

What happened

Maddy v. Blossom Kitchen & Bath Supply Corp. is a proposed class action assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. The order directed the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith effort to settle.

The parties must discuss whether Veronica Maddy has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, as well as whether court-annexed mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge would be useful if they cannot settle themselves.

Judge Rochon ordered the parties to submit a joint letter within 45 days of service stating whether they settled. If not, they must request mediation or a magistrate-judge settlement conference, or ask the court to schedule an initial status conference.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Maddy v. Blossom Kitchen & Bath Supply Corp. · No. 1:22-cv-05234
Judge
Rochon
Date
Nov. 2, 2022

Background

Veronica Maddy brought this proposed class action against Blossom Kitchen & Bath Supply Corp. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon stated that the case had been assigned to her for all purposes.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the parties to meet and confer within 30 days for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle the action. During those discussions, the parties were directed to consider whether Maddy had satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning whether she had the legal basis required to pursue the case in federal court. The order cited Second Circuit decisions concerning standing but did not decide the issue.

The court also ordered the parties to discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the district’s court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive if they could not settle the case themselves. Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the order—the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, identifying a preference between those options, or an initial status conference.

Disposition

Judge Rochon issued a settlement and case-management order. The opinion does not resolve standing, the underlying claims, or the merits of the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.