Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 4, 2022

Strothers v. John Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-09344
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil RightsSection 1983Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Strothers v. John Doe, Judge Swain transferred the constitutional-rights case to New York’s Northern District because venue was improper.

Who this affects

Joseph Strothers and the defendants identified as the John Doe superintendents of Wallkill and Shawangunk Correctional Facilities; the case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Northern District of New York.

What happened

Joseph Strothers, representing himself, sued the superintendents of Wallkill and Shawangunk Correctional Facilities under a federal civil-rights law. He alleged that they violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated at those facilities.

The court found that the alleged events occurred in Ulster County, which is in New York’s Northern District. Because the complaint did not establish a proper basis for venue in the Southern District, the court transferred the case rather than dismissing it.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the clerk to transfer the case to the Northern District of New York and stated that the receiving court would decide whether Strothers could continue without paying fees. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal and closed the case in the Southern District.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strothers v. John Doe · No. 1:22-cv-09344
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 4, 2022

Background

Joseph Strothers, who was incarcerated at Greene Correctional Facility, brought this case without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that the superintendents of Wallkill Correctional Facility and Shawangunk Correctional Facility violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated at those facilities.

Venue Analysis

The court explained that federal law generally permits a civil action to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority. Strothers did not allege where the defendants resided. He did allege that the events giving rise to his claims occurred at Wallkill and Shawangunk, both located in Ulster County, New York.

The court concluded that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York. Ulster County is in the Northern District of New York, so that district was a proper venue because the claims arose there.

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406, a court may transfer a case filed in the wrong venue when transfer is in the interest of justice. Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The order did not dismiss the action. It stated that the receiving court would decide whether Strothers could proceed without prepaying fees, that no summons would issue from the Southern District, and that the Southern District case was closed. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.