Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 9, 2022

Williams v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:22-cv-08633
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Williams v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Judge Oetken ordered service of the complaint through the U.S. Marshals Service.

Who this affects

The order affects Shartisha Williams, the Clerk of Court, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the named defendants New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Dr. Ashwin Vasan, and Dr. Mitchell Katz.

What happened

Shartisha Williams sued New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation and others, alleging that her former employer fired her because of her religion and disability. She brought claims under federal, New York State, and New York City anti-discrimination laws.

The court had allowed Williams to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. Because she was proceeding without a lawyer and without paying those fees, the court directed the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to prepare and serve the legal papers on the named defendants.

Judge Oetken ordered the Clerk to issue summonses and complete service forms for New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Dr. Ashwin Vasan, and Dr. Mitchell Katz. The order did not decide whether Williams’s discrimination allegations were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · No. 1:22-cv-08633
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Nov. 9, 2022

Background

Shartisha Williams brought a pro se action—meaning she was representing herself—against New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation and other defendants. She alleged that her former employer terminated her employment because of her religion and disability. Her claims invoked Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law.

The court had previously granted Williams permission to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepaying court fees.

Service of the Complaint

Because Williams was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, federal law required the court to order the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summonses and complaint. The court explained that Williams could not have served those papers until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued.

The Clerk of Court was instructed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each of these defendants: New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Dr. Ashwin Vasan, and Dr. Mitchell Katz. The Clerk was also instructed to issue summonses and give the U.S. Marshals Service the documents needed to serve them.

Ruling and Further Instructions

Judge J. Paul Oetken ordered the Clerk to complete the service forms using the defendants’ listed addresses and deliver the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. If service was not completed within 90 days after the summonses were issued, Williams was instructed to request more time. She was also required to notify the court in writing if her address changed, and the court stated that it might dismiss the action if she failed to do so.

This order addressed the mechanics of serving the defendants. It did not decide the merits of Williams’s religion- or disability-discrimination claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.