Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 10, 2022

Shah v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:22-cv-09579
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Shah v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Judge Swain ordered payment of fees or an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days, or dismissal.

Who this affects

Kokila Shah and the Secretary of Health and Human Services; the order requires Shah to pay the filing fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying them.

What happened

In Shah v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kokila Shah filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting an application to proceed without prepaying them. The opinion states that Shah was representing herself.

The court ordered Shah, within 30 days, either to pay $402 in filing and administrative fees or submit the attached application. No summons would issue at that time, and the case would be processed if Shah complied. The order states that the action would be dismissed if she did not comply within the deadline.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shah v. Secretary of Health and Human Services · No. 1:22-cv-09579
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Nov. 10, 2022

Background

Kokila Shah filed this civil action without paying the required fees and without submitting an application to proceed without prepaying fees. The opinion states that Shah was proceeding without a lawyer.

Order

The court explained that filing a civil action generally requires payment of $402: a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee. Alternatively, a plaintiff may request permission to proceed without prepaying fees by submitting a signed application. This status is commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis, or IFP.

The court gave Shah 30 days from the date of the order to either pay the $402 or submit the attached IFP application. If Shah submitted the application, it was to identify docket number 22-CV-9579 (LTS). The court stated that, if it granted the application, Shah would be permitted to proceed without prepaying fees.

No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Shah complied with the order, and that the action would be dismissed if she did not comply within the allowed time.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order addressed filing fees and access to the court; it did not decide the merits of Shah’s underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.