Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 10, 2022

Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. United Structure Solution, Inc.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:22-cv-07703
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. United Structure Solution, Inc., Judge Broderick set briefing deadlines.

Who this affects

The petitioners and United Structure Solution, Inc.; the order requires the petitioners to provide additional materials, serve the order, and meet the stated filing deadlines, while giving United Structure Solution, Inc. an opportunity to oppose the petition.

What happened

Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. United Structure Solution, Inc. concerns a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The petitioners filed the complaint on September 9, 2022, and filed an affidavit of service on October 23, 2022.

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by November 24, 2022. United Structure Solution, Inc.’s opposition, if any, was due December 8, 2022, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due December 22, 2022.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick also ordered the petitioners to serve the order on United Structure Solution, Inc. and file an affidavit confirming service. The order did not decide whether to confirm or vacate the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v… · No. 1:22-cv-07703
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Nov. 10, 2022

Background

The petitioners filed a complaint seeking to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion states that the complaint was filed on September 9, 2022, and that the petitioners filed an affidavit of service on October 23, 2022.

Order

The court explained that proceedings to confirm or vacate arbitration awards are treated similarly to motions for summary judgment. It ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting their petition by November 24, 2022. Any opposition from United Structure Solution, Inc. was due December 8, 2022, and any reply from the petitioners was due December 22, 2022.

The court also ordered the petitioners to serve a copy of the order on United Structure Solution, Inc. and file an affidavit on the court’s electronic filing system certifying that service had occurred.

Result

Judge Vernon S. Broderick set a schedule for additional submissions and service. The opinion does not state that the court confirmed or vacated the arbitration award, and it does not resolve the merits of the petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.