Denovellis v. Port Authority Trans Hudson Corp.
- Vyskocil
- 1:19-cv-11780
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Denovellis v. Port Authority Trans Hudson Corp., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, subject to possible restoration.
Thomas Denovellis and Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle.
What happened
In Denovellis v. Port Authority Trans Hudson Corp., Thomas Denovellis informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court ordered the action discontinued without costs to either party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and an application was made by January 3, 2023.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil stated that if no application to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Denovellis v. Port Authority Trans Hudson Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-11780
- Vyskocil
- Nov. 14, 2022
Background
Thomas Denovellis filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Court’s Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by January 3, 2023. The court stated that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Result
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on November 14, 2022. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.