Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 15, 2022

Shalto v. 7 Grams Caffe - 76 Madison LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-05828
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Shalto v. 7 Grams Caffe, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by January 3, 2023.

Who this affects

Lesaldo Shalto and the two defendants, 7 Grams Caffe — 76 Madison LLC and LF/76 Madison Realty LLC; the action was discontinued subject to the stated deadline and condition.

What happened

In Shalto v. 7 Grams Caffe, a defendant told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

The court discontinued the case without costs to any party. It allowed either side to ask to restore the case to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, but the request had to be made by January 3, 2023.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no timely restoration request was made, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shalto v. 7 Grams Caffe - 76 Madison LLC · No. 1:22-cv-05828
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Nov. 15, 2022

Background

A defendant filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or provide the terms of the proposed settlement.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize the settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by January 3, 2023. The court further ordered that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge

The order was issued by United States District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.