Cromitie v. Roset USA Corporation
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-06762
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Cromitie v. Roset USA Corporation, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by December 16, 2022.
Seana Cromitie, Roset USA Corporation, and the people identified in the caption as others similarly situated.
What happened
Seana Cromitie sued Roset USA Corporation on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. The court received Cromitie’s letter reporting that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. The action could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and requested restoration by December 16, 2022.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Cromitie v. Roset USA Corporation · No. 1:22-cv-06762
- Vyskocil
- Nov. 16, 2022
Background
Seana Cromitie brought the action against Roset USA Corporation on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated. The opinion states that the court received a letter from Cromitie informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Court’s action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by December 16, 2022.
The court further ordered that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.