Hopson v. Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.
- Stewart Aaron
- 1:22-cv-05617
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Hopson v. Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc., Judge Rochon ordered the parties to discuss consenting to Magistrate Judge Aaron’s handling of all further proceedings.
Fabian Hopson and Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc. were required to discuss consent to proceedings before Magistrate Judge Aaron and meet the applicable two-week filing deadlines. The order also affected any proposed settlement involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act by reminding the parties that court approval is generally required.
What happened
In Hopson v. Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc., mediation had failed, and the court said it was referring the case to Magistrate Judge Aaron for general pretrial matters, including settlement.
The court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would voluntarily allow Magistrate Judge Aaron to conduct all remaining proceedings. If both agreed, they had two weeks to submit a signed consent form. If either party declined, the parties had to file a joint letter within two weeks without identifying who declined and had to say whether they wanted another settlement conference.
Judge Jennifer L. Rochon did not decide the underlying dispute. She also reminded the parties that settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act generally require court approval.
The detailed version
- Hopson v. Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-05617
- Stewart Aaron
- Nov. 21, 2022
Background
The court was notified that mediation had been unsuccessful. By a separate order issued the same day, the case was being referred to Magistrate Judge Aaron for general pretrial purposes, including settlement.
Consent Request
To conserve resources, promote efficiency, and seek a faster resolution, the court ordered the parties to discuss consenting under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to having Magistrate Judge Aaron conduct all further proceedings. If both parties consented, they had to submit a fully executed consent form within two weeks of the order’s date. If the court approved the form, Magistrate Judge Aaron would conduct the remaining proceedings instead of the district court judge, including any trial and entry of final judgment. An appeal would go directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
If either party did not consent, the parties had to file a joint letter within two weeks stating that they did not consent, without identifying the party or parties who declined. The court stated that withholding consent would not result in adverse consequences. The joint letter also had to state whether the parties wanted a referral to a settlement conference.
Other Reminder and Disposition
The court reminded the parties that, in most cases, settlements involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act require court approval. The order did not resolve the claims or defenses in the case. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon therefore issued a case-management order concerning referral and consent rather than a ruling on the merits.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.