McInnis USA Inc. v. AggreCem Mechanical, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:21-cv-01253
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In McInnis USA Inc. v. AggreCem Mechanical, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after settlement, allowing restoration by January 12, 2023.
McInnis USA Inc. and AggreCem Mechanical, LLC; the action was discontinued subject to the possibility of restoration by January 12, 2023, and would otherwise be dismissed with prejudice.
What happened
McInnis USA Inc. v. AggreCem Mechanical, LLC was discontinued after McInnis told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court imposed no costs on either party and allowed the case to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and requested restoration by January 12, 2023. If no request was made by that date, the dismissal would become with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on November 29, 2022.
The detailed version
- McInnis USA Inc. v. AggreCem Mechanical, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-01253
- Vyskocil
- Nov. 29, 2022
Background
McInnis USA Inc. filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. Restoration was permitted if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and filed an application to restore the action by January 12, 2023. If no such application was filed by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Effect
The order ended the action subject to the stated restoration deadline and condition. It did not decide the underlying claims. The court entered the order on November 29, 2022.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.