Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 28, 2022

Brown v. Donahue

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-09894
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Brown v. Donahue, Judge Swain transferred the prisoner’s civil-rights case to the Western District of New York because venue was improper.

Who this affects

Sammy L. Brown’s case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of New York. The defendants named in the case—J. Donahue, Tammy Hickey, and Ms. O’Dell—remain defendants in the transferred action.

What happened

In Brown v. Donahue, Sammy L. Brown, who is incarcerated at Elmira Correctional Facility, alleged that correctional staff denied him access to review his file, which led to denial of access to the courts. He filed the action without a lawyer under a federal civil-rights law.

The court ruled that the Southern District of New York was not the proper venue because the alleged events occurred at Elmira in Chemung County, which is in the Western District of New York. The court therefore transferred the case there rather than dismissing it.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk to transfer the case and closed the Southern District case. She left the decision about whether Brown could proceed without paying filing fees to the receiving court, and denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. Donahue · No. 1:22-cv-09894
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 28, 2022

Background

Sammy L. Brown, who is incarcerated at Elmira Correctional Facility, brought this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims for violations of constitutional rights by state actors. He alleged that correctional staff at Elmira denied him access to review his file, which resulted in denial of access to the courts. The defendants were J. Donahue, Tammy Hickey, and Ms. O’Dell, identified as correctional staff employed at Elmira.

Venue Analysis

The court explained that federal law generally allows a civil case to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority. Brown did not allege where the defendants resided. He alleged only that the events supporting his claims occurred at Elmira.

Because the defendants were employed at Elmira and the alleged events occurred in Chemung County, the court determined from the complaint that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York. Chemung County is in the Western District of New York, so that district was a proper venue.

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406, a court may transfer a case filed in the wrong venue when doing so serves the interests of justice. The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. The Clerk was directed to carry out the transfer, and the Southern District case was closed.

The court stated that the transferee court would decide whether Brown could continue without prepaying filing fees. It also directed that no summons issue from the Southern District of New York and certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith; fee-free status was therefore denied for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.