Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 29, 2022

Allstar Marketing Group LLC. v. Adocfan-US

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:21-cv-03623
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Allstar Marketing Group v. Adocfan-US, Judge Oetken stayed the case pending a Second Circuit appeal.

Who this affects

The parties in Allstar Marketing Group, LLC. v. Adocfan-US, whose case was placed on hold pending the Second Circuit appeal.

What happened

Allstar Marketing Group, LLC. v. Adocfan-US concerns a case in the Southern District of New York. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute.

The court said that, for the reasons given in an order dated November 29 in a related case, the case would remain on hold while the Second Circuit considered an appeal in Smart Study Co. v. Acuteye-Us.

Judge J. Paul Oetken ordered the case marked as stayed and directed the clerk to close the motion at ECF No. 43.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Allstar Marketing Group LLC. v. Adocfan-US · No. 1:21-cv-03623
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Nov. 29, 2022

Ruling

The court stayed the case pending the Second Circuit appeal in Smart Study Co. v. Acuteye-Us., No. 1:21-CV-5860-GHW. A stay puts the case on hold. The court said the reasons for the stay were stated in a November 29 order in related case No. 21-CV-3621.

The clerk was directed to mark the case as stayed and close the motion at ECF No. 43. The opinion does not provide the underlying claims or explain the reasoning from the related order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.