Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 30, 2022

Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC v. SCWORX Corporation

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-07096
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hadrian Equities Partners v. SCWORX, Judge Rochon required jurisdictional details, directed service of the amended complaint, and required a sanctions-motion update.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC and the other listed plaintiffs, had to serve the amended complaint and provide additional information about diversity jurisdiction. SCWORX Corporation could oppose that jurisdictional submission and had to report whether it was withdrawing its sanctions motion.

What happened

In Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC v. SCWORX Corporation, the court found that the amended complaint did not provide enough citizenship information to establish federal subject-matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship.

The court directed the plaintiffs to serve SCWORX Corporation with the amended complaint and file proof of service. It also ordered the plaintiffs to explain the basis for subject-matter jurisdiction, including the citizenship of Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC’s members and the trust type and citizenship of the Philltp W. Caprio, Jr. 2007 Irrevocable Trust. SCWORX Corporation could file an opposition, and it had to state whether it was withdrawing its sanctions motion.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued the November 30, 2022 order. The order required the filings and service steps but did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC v. SCWORX Corporation · No. 1:22-cv-07096
Judge
Rochon
Date
Nov. 30, 2022

Background

The order followed a conference held on November 30, 2022. The court stated that the amended complaint did not provide sufficient citizenship information to establish subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), the federal diversity-jurisdiction statute.

Court’s directives

The court directed the plaintiffs to promptly serve SCWORX Corporation with the amended complaint and file proof of service on the docket under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

The court ordered the plaintiffs, by December 7, 2022, to explain in no more than five pages the basis for subject-matter jurisdiction. The explanation had to include the citizenship of the members of Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC and the type of trust and citizenship, for diversity-jurisdiction purposes, of the Philltp W. Caprio, Jr. 2007 Irrevocable Trust.

SCWORX Corporation could file an opposition letter of no more than five pages by December 14, 2022. Separately, the court ordered SCWORX Corporation to file a letter by December 6, 2022, stating whether it was withdrawing its motion for sanctions, identified as ECF No. 11.

Disposition

The order imposed service and jurisdictional-information requirements and required an update about the sanctions motion. It did not resolve the merits of the parties’ claims or determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction ultimately exists.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.