Loadholt v. Artesanos Design Collection, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-07419
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Loadholt v. Artesanos, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a reported settlement in principle, allowing restoration by January 17, 2023, otherwise with prejudice.
Christopher Loadholt, the people he sought to represent, and Artesanos Design Collection, LLC were affected by the court’s conditional dismissal of the action.
What happened
In Loadholt v. Artesanos Design Collection, LLC, Christopher Loadholt told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle in his action brought on behalf of himself and others similarly situated.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the action had to be made by January 17, 2023; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on December 2, 2022.
The detailed version
- Loadholt v. Artesanos Design Collection, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-07419
- Vyskocil
- Dec. 2, 2022
Background
Christopher Loadholt brought the action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. The opinion states that Loadholt informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Ruling
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. The court required any application to restore the action to be made by January 17, 2023. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The order does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.